Cleaning deer of lead will take more care, DNR says
A study, spurred by venison contamination found in the spring, shows bullets from some rifles can disperse farther into the animal, requiring new guidelines.
By DOUG SMITHdsmith@startribune.com, Star Tribune
Some lead bullets fired from high-powered rifles scatter lead fragments much farther into deer than hunters might assume, according to a Department of Natural Resources study released Tuesday.
That means the state’s venison processors and 500,000 deer hunters must trim much farther from wound channels to avoid lead contamination.
Lead was found up to 18 inches from wound channels in a study on sheep conducted by the DNR in July, said Lou Cornicelli, DNR big game program leader. The sheep, euthanized first, are anatomically similar to white-tailed deer.
“Some high-velocity lead bullets break apart almost instantly, throwing small pieces of metal all over the place,” Cornicelli said.
Routine trimming likely will not remove all fragments, and the agency can’t make a recommendation about how far out from the wound to trim. The fragments generally are too small to see, feel or detect while chewing.
The study also found rinsing a carcass tended to reduce lead near the wound channel by about 20 percent, but also spread lead.
Cutting 2 inches around the wound channel removes only about 30 percent of the lead fragments, Cornicelli said.
Ballistic-tip bullets, made to rapidly expand on impact, fragmented the most. They averaged 141 fragments per carcass, with an average maximum distance of 11 inches from the wound channel.
Soft-point bullets and bonded lead-core bullets with exposed lead cores had an average of 86 and 82 fragments, respectively, also with a maximum distance of 11 inches.
Shotgun slugs and muzzleloader bullets fragmented far less than lead bullets fired by high-powered rifles. Still, shotgun slugs left an average of 28 fragments at an average maximum distance of 5 inches from the wound. About 25 percent of the state’s firearm harvest falls to shotgun slugs.
Bullets with no exposed lead (with copper cases completely surrounding lead cores) or all-copper bullets would “significantly reduce or eliminate lead exposure.
At first I thought this was a article put out by tree huggers to get
somthing going against the hunting public… I am not so sure now ??? Are
we at risk here ? your thoughts ???
Published Oct 08 2008, 03:20 PM by Stan Ware
Comments
Rory A. DesJardin said:
What they aren’t telling us is the quantity of “tainted” meat you would have to eat to suffer any ill effects. I think either the NRA or NSSF has a more realistic article on the subject.
I chewed lead paint off of my crib and toys and ate deer meat from being killed by lead bullets my whole childhood. And I’m fine, at least I am suffering no ill effects from Lead poisoning anyway. Anything the Green crowd can do to promote Anti-hunting and in reality Gun control they will do.
If you own a gun “they” are out to get us.
October 8, 2008 5:58 PM
Hope Carleton said:
Stan,
Rory “hit the nail on the head” in his comments…. The consumption of deer meat or any game harvested by firearms suffers when articles like this surface and I really have to wonder about the motives of their authors. I will continue to eat venison but after reading this “lead warning” I will strive not to hit any of the “good pieces” such as tenderloin, back straps or hams….;>)……but I worry how the” Nyhus Boys” remove all that lead shot from pheasants!….maybe they should send some to me for a “study”..;>)
-H